Hypoallergenic Cosmetics

The term “hypoallergenic” is not strictly defined by many regulatory bodies, but it generally implies that a product is formulated to minimize the risk of allergic reactions. Unlike terms like “dermatologically tested” or “clinically proven,” which have clearer scientific implications, “hypoallergenic” is often used more loosely in marketing. However, for brands that want to make this claim credibly, they must back it up with scientific evidence.

To substantiate the hypoallergenic claim, and avoid misleading consumers and potential legal repercussions, cosmetic companies must substantiate these claims through scientifically validated testing.

Laboratory Testing to Substantiate Hypoallergenic Claim

Proving that a cosmetic product is hypoallergenic involves a series of in vitro and in vivo tests designed to assess the potential of a product to cause irritation or allergic reactions.

The following are key testing methodologies:

Patch testing (In Vivo Testing)

Patch testing is a common in vivo method used to assess the potential for skin irritation and sensitization. This test involves applying a small amount of the product to the skin, usually on the back, under controlled conditions. The product is left on the skin for 24 to 48 hours, after which the site is examined for any signs of irritation, such as redness, swelling, or itching.

• Repeat Insult Patch Test (RIPT): To evaluate the cumulative irritation and sensitization potential, RIPT is conducted. It involves multiple applications over a few weeks and is more indicative of how the product might affect consumers over time.

Human Repeat Insult Patch Test (HRIPT)

HRIPT is another in vivo testing method widely recognized in the cosmetics industry. It is designed to determine if repeated exposure to a cosmetic product induces an allergic reaction. Participants, usually volunteers with no known sensitivities, are subjected to multiple product applications, followed by a rest period, and then a challenge phase. Any signs of irritation or sensitization are carefully monitored and recorded.

In Vitro Testing

With the increasing pressure to reduce animal testing and the ethical implications surrounding it, in vitro tests are becoming more popular. These tests involve using cell cultures or reconstructed human epidermis models to evaluate the irritation potential of cosmetic ingredients.

• 3D Skin Models: Advanced in vitro testing uses reconstructed human skin models, like EpiDerm or SkinEthic, which can simulate human skin responses to the application of cosmetic formulations.
• Cytotoxicity Assays: These tests measure the degree of cell damage caused by cosmetic ingredients, helping determine potential irritancy without using animal models.
• HET-CAM Test: The Hen’s Egg Test on the Chorioallantoic Membrane is an alternative to animal testing, focusing on assessing the irritation potential of cosmetic formulations.

Regulatory Considerations for Hypoallergenic Cosmetics

In the EU, cosmetic products are regulated under the Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009. Although the term “hypoallergenic” is not explicitly defined, products making this claim must comply with the broader regulations that ensure consumer safety. Companies must maintain a Product Information File (PIF) that includes safety assessments, including evidence to support hypoallergenic claims.

Need laboratory tests? Check out our shop!